Best Known (165, 165+68, s)-Nets in Base 2
(165, 165+68, 135)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (165, 233, 135)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (165, 234, 135)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 78, 45)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 44)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 9 and N(F) ≥ 45, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (9, 44)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (9, 78, 45)-net over F8, using
(165, 165+68, 217)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (165, 233, 217)-net over F2, using
(165, 165+68, 1514)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (165, 233, 1515)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 13839 450572 436596 134312 807638 318552 919259 625634 508649 938556 125016 003103 > 2233 [i]