MinT - Best Known (191−69, 191, s)-Nets in Base 2

Best Known (191−69, 191, s)-Nets in Base 2

(191−69, 191, 68)-Net over F₂ — Constructive and digital

Digital (122, 191, 68)-net over F₂, using

11 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (122, 202, 68)-net over F₂, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (21, 101, 34)-net over F₄, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F₄, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₄ with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
      - T₅ from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F₄ [i]

(191−69, 191, 72)-Net in Base 2 — Constructive

(122, 191, 72)-net in base 2, using

1 times m-reduction [i] based on (122, 192, 72)-net in base 2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on (26, 96, 36)-net in base 4, using
  - net from sequence [i] based on (26, 35)-sequence in base 4, using
    - base expansion [i] based on digital (52, 35)-sequence over F₂, using
      - t-expansion [i] based on digital (51, 35)-sequence over F₂, using
        Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ III based on the algebraic function field F/F₂ with g(F)Â =Â 41, N(F)Â =Â 32, 1 place with degree 2, and 3 places with degree 4 [i] based on function field F/F₂ with g(F) = 41 and N(F) ≥ 32, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]

(191−69, 191, 112)-Net over F₂ — Digital

Digital (122, 191, 112)-net over F₂, using

Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i]

(191−69, 191, 602)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s

There is no (122, 191, 603)-net in base 2, because

1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (122, 190, 603)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2^mÂ â‰¥ 1619 354936 004886 816668 248490 203127 436676 839040 948449 081578 > 2¹⁹⁰ [i]