Best Known (217−69, 217, s)-Nets in Base 2
(217−69, 217, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (148, 217, 112)-net over F2, using
- 13 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (148, 230, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 115, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 115, 56)-net over F4, using
(217−69, 217, 167)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (148, 217, 167)-net over F2, using
(217−69, 217, 1056)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (148, 217, 1057)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (148, 216, 1057)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 105630 669207 954149 588900 318134 284796 070351 907354 618656 663763 099716 > 2216 [i]