Best Known (229−70, 229, s)-Nets in Base 2
(229−70, 229, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (159, 229, 112)-net over F2, using
- 23 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (159, 252, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 126, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 126, 56)-net over F4, using
(229−70, 229, 191)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (159, 229, 191)-net over F2, using
(229−70, 229, 1245)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (159, 229, 1246)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 869 833179 536484 276410 464354 994674 534621 397641 486584 699389 063193 048036 > 2229 [i]