Best Known (126−73, 126, s)-Nets in Base 2
(126−73, 126, 36)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (53, 126, 36)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (51, 126, 36)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (51, 35)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41, N(F) = 32, 1 place with degree 2, and 3 places with degree 4 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41 and N(F) ≥ 32, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (51, 35)-sequence over F2, using
(126−73, 126, 40)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (53, 126, 40)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (50, 126, 40)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 39)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 50 and N(F) ≥ 40, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (50, 39)-sequence over F2, using
(126−73, 126, 111)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (53, 126, 112)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (53, 125, 112)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 42 689091 147585 277629 167166 433099 502799 > 2125 [i]