Best Known (164, 164+73, s)-Nets in Base 2
(164, 164+73, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (164, 237, 112)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (163, 237, 112)-net over F2, using
- 23 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- 23 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
(164, 164+73, 194)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (164, 237, 194)-net over F2, using
(164, 164+73, 1290)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (164, 237, 1291)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (164, 236, 1291)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 111312 189123 080858 761995 324770 991414 805948 130514 080190 137883 261627 295984 > 2236 [i]