Best Known (169, 169+73, s)-Nets in Base 2
(169, 169+73, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (169, 242, 112)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (163, 242, 112)-net over F2, using
- 18 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- 18 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
(169, 169+73, 207)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (169, 242, 207)-net over F2, using
(169, 169+73, 1426)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (169, 242, 1427)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (169, 241, 1427)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 589106 855491 066861 065363 986262 394597 736084 929020 682706 844447 920132 682288 > 2241 [i]