Best Known (166, 166+74, s)-Nets in Base 2
(166, 166+74, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (166, 240, 112)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (163, 240, 112)-net over F2, using
- 20 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- 20 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
(166, 166+74, 195)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (166, 240, 195)-net over F2, using
(166, 166+74, 1259)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (166, 240, 1260)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 773822 202478 163795 820210 148577 708740 146226 779176 886070 010820 493411 001126 > 2240 [i]