Best Known (249−77, 249, s)-Nets in Base 2
(249−77, 249, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (172, 249, 112)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (163, 249, 112)-net over F2, using
- 11 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- 11 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
(249−77, 249, 200)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (172, 249, 200)-net over F2, using
(249−77, 249, 1329)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (172, 249, 1330)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (172, 248, 1330)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 459 341640 017590 401316 055359 510932 961708 963689 271489 499368 783164 726300 740040 > 2248 [i]