Best Known (169, 169+77, s)-Nets in Base 2
(169, 169+77, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (169, 246, 112)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (163, 246, 112)-net over F2, using
- 14 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- 14 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
(169, 169+77, 193)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (169, 246, 193)-net over F2, using
(169, 169+77, 1255)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (169, 246, 1256)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (169, 245, 1256)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 56 956720 489761 202278 901691 401808 059572 495555 536378 060701 382864 551458 512973 > 2245 [i]