Best Known (236−78, 236, s)-Nets in Base 2
(236−78, 236, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (158, 236, 112)-net over F2, using
- 14 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (158, 250, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 125, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 125, 56)-net over F4, using
(236−78, 236, 164)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (158, 236, 164)-net over F2, using
(236−78, 236, 964)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (158, 236, 965)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 112544 364462 559833 269794 902303 476487 397050 139269 022733 431127 811746 219120 > 2236 [i]