Best Known (104−8, 104, s)-Nets in Base 2
(104−8, 104, 2097215)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (96, 104, 2097215)-net over F2, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2104, 2097215, F2, 8, 8) (dual of [(2097215, 8), 16777616, 9]-NRT-code), using
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(2104, 2097215, F2, 7, 8) (dual of [(2097215, 7), 14680401, 9]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- linear OOA(212, 65, F2, 7, 4) (dual of [(65, 7), 443, 5]-NRT-code), using
- appending 3 arbitrary columns [i] based on linear OOA(212, 65, F2, 4, 4) (dual of [(65, 4), 248, 5]-NRT-code), using
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(212, 65, F2, 3, 4) (dual of [(65, 3), 183, 5]-NRT-code), using
- extracting embedded OOA [i] based on digital (8, 12, 65)-net over F2, using
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(212, 65, F2, 3, 4) (dual of [(65, 3), 183, 5]-NRT-code), using
- appending 3 arbitrary columns [i] based on linear OOA(212, 65, F2, 4, 4) (dual of [(65, 4), 248, 5]-NRT-code), using
- linear OOA(292, 2097150, F2, 7, 8) (dual of [(2097150, 7), 14679958, 9]-NRT-code), using
- OA 4-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(292, 8388600, F2, 8) (dual of [8388600, 8388508, 9]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(292, large, F2, 8) (dual of [large, large−92, 9]-code), using
- the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 8388607 = 223−1, defining interval I = [1,8], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 9 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(292, large, F2, 8) (dual of [large, large−92, 9]-code), using
- OA 4-folding and stacking [i] based on linear OA(292, 8388600, F2, 8) (dual of [8388600, 8388508, 9]-code), using
- linear OOA(212, 65, F2, 7, 4) (dual of [(65, 7), 443, 5]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(2104, 2097215, F2, 7, 8) (dual of [(2097215, 7), 14680401, 9]-NRT-code), using
(104−8, 104, 3604519)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (96, 104, 3604519)-net over F2, using
- net defined by OOA [i] based on linear OOA(2104, 3604519, F2, 8, 8) (dual of [(3604519, 8), 28836048, 9]-NRT-code), using
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(2104, 3604519, F2, 7, 8) (dual of [(3604519, 7), 25231529, 9]-NRT-code), using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(2104, 3604519, F2, 2, 8) (dual of [(3604519, 2), 7208934, 9]-NRT-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(2104, 4194366, F2, 2, 8) (dual of [(4194366, 2), 8388628, 9]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- linear OOA(212, 65, F2, 2, 4) (dual of [(65, 2), 118, 5]-NRT-code), using
- extracting embedded OOA [i] based on digital (8, 12, 65)-net over F2, using
- linear OOA(292, 4194301, F2, 2, 8) (dual of [(4194301, 2), 8388510, 9]-NRT-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(292, 8388602, F2, 8) (dual of [8388602, 8388510, 9]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(292, large, F2, 8) (dual of [large, large−92, 9]-code), using
- the primitive narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 8388607 = 223−1, defining interval I = [1,8], and designed minimum distance d ≥ |I|+1 = 9 [i]
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(292, large, F2, 8) (dual of [large, large−92, 9]-code), using
- OOA 2-folding [i] based on linear OA(292, 8388602, F2, 8) (dual of [8388602, 8388510, 9]-code), using
- linear OOA(212, 65, F2, 2, 4) (dual of [(65, 2), 118, 5]-NRT-code), using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OOA(2104, 4194366, F2, 2, 8) (dual of [(4194366, 2), 8388628, 9]-NRT-code), using
- embedding of OOA with Gilbert–Varšamov bound [i] based on linear OOA(2104, 3604519, F2, 2, 8) (dual of [(3604519, 2), 7208934, 9]-NRT-code), using
- appending kth column [i] based on linear OOA(2104, 3604519, F2, 7, 8) (dual of [(3604519, 7), 25231529, 9]-NRT-code), using
(104−8, 104, large)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (96, 104, large)-net in base 2, because
- 6 times m-reduction [i] would yield (96, 98, large)-net in base 2, but