Best Known (235−82, 235, s)-Nets in Base 2
(235−82, 235, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (153, 235, 112)-net over F2, using
- 5 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (153, 240, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 120, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 120, 56)-net over F4, using
(235−82, 235, 144)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (153, 235, 144)-net over F2, using
(235−82, 235, 798)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (153, 235, 799)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 56283 451032 712274 119804 491048 089387 325755 438666 656572 739941 936284 374080 > 2235 [i]