Best Known (259−83, 259, s)-Nets in Base 2
(259−83, 259, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (176, 259, 112)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (163, 259, 112)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
(259−83, 259, 191)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (176, 259, 191)-net over F2, using
(259−83, 259, 1205)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (176, 259, 1206)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (176, 258, 1206)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 468759 787455 756783 443082 551252 813134 097465 340136 063141 364703 494962 326978 886290 > 2258 [i]