Best Known (222−85, 222, s)-Nets in Base 2
(222−85, 222, 75)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (137, 222, 75)-net over F2, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (137, 225, 75)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 83, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (54, 142, 42)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 83, 33)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(222−85, 222, 111)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (137, 222, 111)-net over F2, using
(222−85, 222, 573)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (137, 222, 574)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (137, 221, 574)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 427546 997603 864267 928403 353719 180917 788130 507314 192426 265396 200526 > 2221 [i]