Best Known (200−86, 200, s)-Nets in Base 2
(200−86, 200, 60)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (114, 200, 60)-net over F2, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (114, 202, 60)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (13, 101, 30)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 29)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- F4 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 13 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (13, 29)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (13, 101, 30)-net over F4, using
(200−86, 200, 78)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (114, 200, 78)-net over F2, using
(200−86, 200, 298)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (114, 200, 299)-net in base 2, because
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield OA(2200, 299, S2, 86), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield OA(2201, 300, S2, 87), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 6062 729839 358588 077129 287653 744482 312929 554681 473387 231550 995785 979703 893542 676711 534073 403563 590830 522368 / 1273 266655 863433 158102 727954 895995 795355 723661 > 2201 [i]
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield OA(2201, 300, S2, 87), but