Best Known (246−86, 246, s)-Nets in Base 2
(246−86, 246, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (160, 246, 112)-net over F2, using
- 8 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (160, 254, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 127, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 127, 56)-net over F4, using
(246−86, 246, 149)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (160, 246, 149)-net over F2, using
(246−86, 246, 828)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (160, 246, 829)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 115 621738 564298 391897 958560 763430 593014 015505 116779 512265 604415 225280 106400 > 2246 [i]