Best Known (121−87, 121, s)-Nets in Base 2
(121−87, 121, 24)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (34, 121, 24)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 121, 24)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 23)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 23)-sequence over F2, using
(121−87, 121, 28)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (34, 121, 28)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 121, 28)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 27)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 28, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 27)-sequence over F2, using
(121−87, 121, 53)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (34, 121, 54)-net in base 2, because
- 19 times m-reduction [i] would yield (34, 102, 54)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2102, 54, S2, 2, 68), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 162 259276 829213 363391 578010 288128 / 23 > 2102 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2102, 54, S2, 2, 68), but