Best Known (127, 127+87, s)-Nets in Base 2
(127, 127+87, 67)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (127, 214, 67)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 82, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (45, 132, 34)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 33)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41, N(F) = 32, 1 place with degree 2, and 1 place with degree 4 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41 and N(F) ≥ 32, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 33)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 82, 33)-net over F2, using
(127, 127+87, 94)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (127, 214, 94)-net over F2, using
(127, 127+87, 462)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (127, 214, 463)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (127, 213, 463)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 13722 292523 756292 291567 784529 650394 676608 379915 779848 907969 798660 > 2213 [i]