Best Known (140, 140+87, s)-Nets in Base 2
(140, 140+87, 75)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (140, 227, 75)-net over F2, using
- 7 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (140, 234, 75)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 86, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (54, 148, 42)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 86, 33)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(140, 140+87, 113)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (140, 227, 113)-net over F2, using
(140, 140+87, 583)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (140, 227, 584)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (140, 226, 584)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 108 884571 738866 631206 146943 921238 242318 749898 568521 072632 294986 625560 > 2226 [i]