Best Known (259−88, 259, s)-Nets in Base 2
(259−88, 259, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (171, 259, 112)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (163, 259, 112)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
(259−88, 259, 167)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (171, 259, 167)-net over F2, using
(259−88, 259, 957)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (171, 259, 958)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 964982 526871 297088 156403 278281 140820 171585 754784 445086 480617 895410 747080 094205 > 2259 [i]