Best Known (160, 160+88, s)-Nets in Base 2
(160, 160+88, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (160, 248, 112)-net over F2, using
- 6 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (160, 254, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 127, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 127, 56)-net over F4, using
(160, 160+88, 146)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (160, 248, 146)-net over F2, using
(160, 160+88, 794)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (160, 248, 795)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 452 441155 101380 529401 842828 028916 943670 059422 463328 263453 069056 781671 929184 > 2248 [i]