Best Known (133−89, 133, s)-Nets in Base 2
(133−89, 133, 33)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (44, 133, 33)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (39, 133, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
(133−89, 133, 34)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (44, 133, 34)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (43, 133, 34)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (43, 33)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 43 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (43, 33)-sequence over F2, using
(133−89, 133, 67)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (44, 133, 68)-net in base 2, because
- 5 times m-reduction [i] would yield (44, 128, 68)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2128, 68, S2, 2, 84), but
- the LP bound with quadratic polynomials shows that M ≥ 29944 848289 042584 784776 965453 995602 608128 / 85 > 2128 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2128, 68, S2, 2, 84), but