Best Known (170, 170+89, s)-Nets in Base 2
(170, 170+89, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (170, 259, 112)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (163, 259, 112)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
(170, 170+89, 162)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (170, 259, 162)-net over F2, using
(170, 170+89, 941)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (170, 259, 942)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (170, 258, 942)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 481217 887135 759073 249570 008349 674973 416894 758199 653838 419189 819832 946391 000561 > 2258 [i]