Best Known (119−90, 119, s)-Nets in Base 2
(119−90, 119, 21)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (29, 119, 21)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (21, 119, 21)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 21, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
(119−90, 119, 25)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (29, 119, 25)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (28, 119, 25)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 24)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 28 and N(F) ≥ 25, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (28, 24)-sequence over F2, using
(119−90, 119, 40)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (29, 119, 41)-net in base 2, because
- 3 times m-reduction [i] would yield (29, 116, 41)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2116, 41, S2, 3, 87), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 1 163074 496311 801388 790831 177745 301504 / 11 > 2116 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2116, 41, S2, 3, 87), but