Best Known (230−90, 230, s)-Nets in Base 2
(230−90, 230, 75)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (140, 230, 75)-net over F2, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (140, 234, 75)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 86, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (54, 148, 42)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 86, 33)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
(230−90, 230, 109)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (140, 230, 109)-net over F2, using
(230−90, 230, 545)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (140, 230, 546)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1804 234971 117470 575034 389910 046112 302110 037109 331597 281405 447390 672768 > 2230 [i]