Best Known (250−90, 250, s)-Nets in Base 2
(250−90, 250, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (160, 250, 112)-net over F2, using
- 4 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (160, 254, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 127, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 127, 56)-net over F4, using
(250−90, 250, 142)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (160, 250, 142)-net over F2, using
(250−90, 250, 764)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (160, 250, 765)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1870 231146 640255 098987 109547 108147 030322 595328 185246 568691 321242 229420 073398 > 2250 [i]