Best Known (136, 136+90, s)-Nets in Base 2
(136, 136+90, 70)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (136, 226, 70)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (21, 66, 21)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 21, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (70, 160, 49)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (70, 48)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69, N(F) = 48, and 1 place with degree 2 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69 and N(F) ≥ 48, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (70, 48)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (21, 66, 21)-net over F2, using
(136, 136+90, 103)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (136, 226, 103)-net over F2, using
(136, 136+90, 509)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (136, 226, 510)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 115 004942 296175 583258 500230 330031 316685 033495 456053 036583 970048 943701 > 2226 [i]