Best Known (223−91, 223, s)-Nets in Base 2
(223−91, 223, 68)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (132, 223, 68)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 84, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (48, 139, 35)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (48, 34)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41, N(F) = 32, 1 place with degree 2, and 2 places with degree 4 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41 and N(F) ≥ 32, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (48, 34)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 84, 33)-net over F2, using
(223−91, 223, 97)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (132, 223, 97)-net over F2, using
(223−91, 223, 475)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (132, 223, 476)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (132, 222, 476)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7 234092 658138 984766 660742 769705 622107 317701 125886 032922 231705 541176 > 2222 [i]