Best Known (259−91, 259, s)-Nets in Base 2
(259−91, 259, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (168, 259, 112)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (163, 259, 112)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
(259−91, 259, 155)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (168, 259, 155)-net over F2, using
(259−91, 259, 872)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (168, 259, 873)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (168, 258, 873)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 466666 833534 376583 700554 943158 230453 411099 983828 385760 985598 972028 406303 286336 > 2258 [i]