MinT - Best Known (238−92, 238, s)-Nets in Base 2

Best Known (238−92, 238, s)-Nets in Base 2

(238−92, 238, 76)-Net over F₂ — Constructive and digital

Digital (146, 238, 76)-net over F₂, using

2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (146, 240, 76)-net over F₂, using
- (u,Â u+v)-construction [i] based on
  1. digital (45, 92, 34)-net over F₂, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 33)-sequence over F₂, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ III based on the algebraic function field F/F₂ with g(F)Â =Â 41, N(F)Â =Â 32, 1 place with degree 2, and 1 place with degree 4 [i] based on function field F/F₂ with g(F) = 41 and N(F) ≥ 32, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
  2. digital (54, 148, 42)-net over F₂, using
    - net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F₂, using
      - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂ with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
        an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]

(238−92, 238, 84)-Net in Base 2 — Constructive

(146, 238, 84)-net in base 2, using

trace code for nets [i] based on (27, 119, 42)-net in base 4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on (27, 41)-sequence in base 4, using
  - base expansion [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F₂, using
    - Niederreiterâ€“Xing sequence constructionÂ II/III [i] based on function field F/F₂ with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
      - an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]

(238−92, 238, 116)-Net over F₂ — Digital

Digital (146, 238, 116)-net over F₂, using

Gilbertâ€“VarÅ¡amov bound [i]

(238−92, 238, 584)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s

There is no (146, 238, 585)-net in base 2, because

the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2^mÂ â‰¥ 462389 038406 959118 253485 047578 157270 117760 712726 262953 680197 413037 738720 > 2²³⁸ [i]