Best Known (260−92, 260, s)-Nets in Base 2
(260−92, 260, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (168, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (163, 260, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 130, 56)-net over F4, using
(260−92, 260, 153)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (168, 260, 153)-net over F2, using
(260−92, 260, 838)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (168, 260, 839)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 862520 863483 821627 777270 716756 393466 846759 516792 571928 121488 093967 133166 187800 > 2260 [i]