Best Known (145, 145+93, s)-Nets in Base 2
(145, 145+93, 76)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (145, 238, 76)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (45, 91, 34)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 33)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41, N(F) = 32, 1 place with degree 2, and 1 place with degree 4 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41 and N(F) ≥ 32, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (45, 33)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (54, 147, 42)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (45, 91, 34)-net over F2, using
(145, 145+93, 113)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (145, 238, 113)-net over F2, using
(145, 145+93, 574)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (145, 238, 575)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (145, 237, 575)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 225949 364621 045091 442353 401007 548056 033289 529639 981614 573299 592798 394849 > 2237 [i]