Best Known (138, 138+97, s)-Nets in Base 2
(138, 138+97, 69)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (138, 235, 69)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (39, 87, 33)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 39 and N(F) ≥ 33, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (39, 32)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (51, 148, 36)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (51, 35)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41, N(F) = 32, 1 place with degree 2, and 3 places with degree 4 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 41 and N(F) ≥ 32, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (51, 35)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (39, 87, 33)-net over F2, using
(138, 138+97, 99)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (138, 235, 99)-net over F2, using
(138, 138+97, 482)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (138, 235, 483)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (138, 234, 483)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 29080 450533 297807 683217 056694 595954 759593 552024 827236 551859 212082 584084 > 2234 [i]