Best Known (66, 66+98, s)-Nets in Base 2
(66, 66+98, 43)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (66, 164, 43)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (59, 164, 43)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (59, 42)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54, N(F) = 42, and 1 place with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (59, 42)-sequence over F2, using
(66, 66+98, 48)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (66, 164, 48)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (65, 164, 48)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (65, 47)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 65 and N(F) ≥ 48, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (65, 47)-sequence over F2, using
(66, 66+98, 131)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (66, 164, 132)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 23 833163 014998 362013 216439 841010 845096 716736 154408 > 2164 [i]