Best Known (26, 101, s)-Nets in Base 2
(26, 101, 21)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (26, 101, 21)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (21, 101, 21)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 21, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
(26, 101, 24)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (26, 101, 24)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (25, 101, 24)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (25, 23)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 25 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (25, 23)-sequence over F2, using
(26, 101, 42)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (26, 101, 43)-net in base 2, because
- 21 times m-reduction [i] would yield (26, 80, 43)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(280, 43, S2, 2, 54), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 19 342813 113834 066795 298816 / 11 > 280 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(280, 43, S2, 2, 54), but