Best Known (26, 125, s)-Nets in Base 2
(26, 125, 21)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (26, 125, 21)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (21, 125, 21)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 21, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 20)-sequence over F2, using
(26, 125, 24)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (26, 125, 24)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (25, 125, 24)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (25, 23)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 25 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (25, 23)-sequence over F2, using
(26, 125, 36)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (26, 125, 37)-net in base 2, because
- 20 times m-reduction [i] would yield (26, 105, 37)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2105, 37, S2, 3, 79), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 223 106505 640168 374663 419764 146176 / 5 > 2105 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2105, 37, S2, 3, 79), but