Best Known (38, 145, s)-Nets in Base 2
(38, 145, 24)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (38, 145, 24)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 145, 24)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 23)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 23)-sequence over F2, using
(38, 145, 30)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (38, 145, 30)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (36, 145, 30)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (36, 29)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 36 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (36, 29)-sequence over F2, using
(38, 145, 58)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (38, 145, 59)-net in base 2, because
- 33 times m-reduction [i] would yield (38, 112, 59)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2112, 59, S2, 2, 74), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 83076 749736 557242 056487 941267 521536 / 15 > 2112 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2112, 59, S2, 2, 74), but