Best Known (90, 159, s)-Nets in Base 2
(90, 159, 54)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (90, 159, 54)-net over F2, using
- 1 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (90, 160, 54)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 80, 27)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 26)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 10 and N(F) ≥ 27, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (10, 26)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (10, 80, 27)-net over F4, using
(90, 159, 63)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (90, 159, 63)-net over F2, using
(90, 159, 291)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (90, 159, 292)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (90, 158, 292)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 372141 549554 181187 598879 180072 044355 158719 294075 > 2158 [i]