Best Known (130, 160, s)-Nets in Base 2
(130, 160, 265)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (130, 160, 265)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (1, 16, 5)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 4)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 5, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (1, 4)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (114, 144, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 36, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 36, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (1, 16, 5)-net over F2, using
(130, 160, 543)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (130, 160, 543)-net over F2, using
(130, 160, 10419)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (130, 160, 10420)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 462994 297344 266485 140088 081074 799411 566812 791428 > 2160 [i]