Best Known (38, 162, s)-Nets in Base 2
(38, 162, 24)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (38, 162, 24)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (33, 162, 24)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 23)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 24, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 23)-sequence over F2, using
(38, 162, 30)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (38, 162, 30)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (36, 162, 30)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (36, 29)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 36 and N(F) ≥ 30, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (36, 29)-sequence over F2, using
(38, 162, 51)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (38, 162, 52)-net in base 2, because
- 15 times m-reduction [i] would yield (38, 147, 52)-net in base 2, but
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2147, 52, S2, 3, 109), but
- the LP bound with quadratic polynomials shows that M ≥ 30685 825393 178137 442753 148343 164145 432229 052416 / 165 > 2147 [i]
- extracting embedded OOA [i] would yield OOA(2147, 52, S2, 3, 109), but