Best Known (84, 162, s)-Nets in Base 2
(84, 162, 51)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (84, 162, 51)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (80, 162, 51)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (80, 50)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction III based on the algebraic function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69, N(F) = 48, 1 place with degree 2, and 2 places with degree 6 [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 69 and N(F) ≥ 48, using an explicitly constructive algebraic function field [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (80, 50)-sequence over F2, using
(84, 162, 57)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (84, 162, 57)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (83, 162, 57)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (83, 56)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 83 and N(F) ≥ 57, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (83, 56)-sequence over F2, using
(84, 162, 190)-Net over F2 — Upper bound on s (digital)
There is no digital (84, 162, 191)-net over F2, because
- extracting embedded orthogonal array [i] would yield linear OA(2162, 191, F2, 78) (dual of [191, 29, 79]-code), but
- 4 times code embedding in larger space [i] would yield linear OA(2166, 195, F2, 78) (dual of [195, 29, 79]-code), but
- adding a parity check bit [i] would yield linear OA(2167, 196, F2, 79) (dual of [196, 29, 80]-code), but
- 4 times code embedding in larger space [i] would yield linear OA(2166, 195, F2, 78) (dual of [195, 29, 79]-code), but
(84, 162, 221)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (84, 162, 222)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 6 655911 793281 744533 817694 989828 307774 808151 238320 > 2162 [i]