Best Known (116, 164, s)-Nets in Base 2
(116, 164, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (116, 164, 112)-net over F2, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (116, 166, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 83, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 83, 56)-net over F4, using
(116, 164, 160)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (116, 164, 160)-net over F2, using
(116, 164, 1082)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (116, 164, 1083)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 23 433869 616726 454116 140676 171537 314682 841203 191047 > 2164 [i]