Best Known (149, 183, s)-Nets in Base 2
(149, 183, 270)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (149, 183, 270)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (6, 23, 10)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 9)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 10, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 9)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (126, 160, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 40, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 40, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (6, 23, 10)-net over F2, using
(149, 183, 618)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (149, 183, 618)-net over F2, using
(149, 183, 12461)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (149, 183, 12462)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 12 266084 498788 078397 179334 568124 810850 933021 572503 605214 > 2183 [i]