Best Known (143, 189, s)-Nets in Base 2
(143, 189, 195)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (143, 189, 195)-net over F2, using
- t-expansion [i] based on digital (142, 189, 195)-net over F2, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (142, 192, 195)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 64, 65)-net over F8, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Suzuki function field over F8 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F8 with g(F) = 14 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (14, 64)-sequence over F8, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (14, 64, 65)-net over F8, using
- 3 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (142, 192, 195)-net over F2, using
(143, 189, 287)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (143, 189, 287)-net over F2, using
(143, 189, 2772)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (143, 189, 2773)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 787 800725 226041 467887 196397 348702 426130 958610 088979 456568 > 2189 [i]