Best Known (136, 195, s)-Nets in Base 2
(136, 195, 112)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (136, 195, 112)-net over F2, using
- 11 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (136, 206, 112)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 103, 56)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- F5 from the tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 33 and N(F) ≥ 56, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (33, 55)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (33, 103, 56)-net over F4, using
(136, 195, 171)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (136, 195, 171)-net over F2, using
(136, 195, 1162)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (136, 195, 1163)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (136, 194, 1163)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 25429 892800 873822 850533 810669 519160 458639 405743 392657 039232 > 2194 [i]