Best Known (160, 199, s)-Nets in Base 2
(160, 199, 263)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (160, 199, 263)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (0, 19, 3)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 2)-sequence over F2, using
- Faure sequence [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 0 and N(F) ≥ 3, using
- the rational function field F2(x) [i]
- Niederreiter sequence [i]
- Sobol sequence [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (0, 2)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (141, 180, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 45, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 45, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (0, 19, 3)-net over F2, using
(160, 199, 552)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (160, 199, 552)-net over F2, using
(160, 199, 10842)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (160, 199, 10843)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (160, 198, 10843)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 401791 651079 979848 681357 922533 832655 164602 347702 848165 783442 > 2198 [i]