Best Known (123, 202, s)-Nets in Base 2
(123, 202, 68)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (123, 202, 68)-net over F2, using
- 2 times m-reduction [i] based on digital (123, 204, 68)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (21, 102, 34)-net over F4, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- T5 from the second tower of function fields by GarcÃa and Stichtenoth over F4 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F4 with g(F) = 21 and N(F) ≥ 34, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (21, 33)-sequence over F4, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (21, 102, 34)-net over F4, using
(123, 202, 98)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (123, 202, 98)-net over F2, using
(123, 202, 492)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (123, 202, 493)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (123, 201, 493)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 262638 753226 425232 349619 352546 997693 272991 649609 216929 933656 > 2201 [i]