Best Known (116, 203, s)-Nets in Base 2
(116, 203, 62)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (116, 203, 62)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (19, 62, 20)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 19)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 19 and N(F) ≥ 20, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (19, 19)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (54, 141, 42)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 54 and N(F) ≥ 42, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (54, 41)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (19, 62, 20)-net over F2, using
(116, 203, 80)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (116, 203, 80)-net over F2, using
(116, 203, 378)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (116, 203, 379)-net in base 2, because
- 1 times m-reduction [i] would yield (116, 202, 379)-net in base 2, but
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7 027518 461283 820382 078975 324143 503869 849449 789809 978277 605418 > 2202 [i]