Best Known (165, 203, s)-Nets in Base 2
(165, 203, 271)-Net over F2 — Constructive and digital
Digital (165, 203, 271)-net over F2, using
- (u, u+v)-construction [i] based on
- digital (8, 27, 11)-net over F2, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 10)-sequence over F2, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 8 and N(F) ≥ 11, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence (Piršić implementation) with equidistant coordinate [i]
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (8, 10)-sequence over F2, using
- digital (138, 176, 260)-net over F2, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 44, 65)-net over F16, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- the Hermitian function field over F16 [i]
- Niederreiter–Xing sequence construction II/III [i] based on function field F/F16 with g(F) = 6 and N(F) ≥ 65, using
- net from sequence [i] based on digital (6, 64)-sequence over F16, using
- trace code for nets [i] based on digital (6, 44, 65)-net over F16, using
- digital (8, 27, 11)-net over F2, using
(165, 203, 652)-Net over F2 — Digital
Digital (165, 203, 652)-net over F2, using
(165, 203, 13018)-Net in Base 2 — Upper bound on s
There is no (165, 203, 13019)-net in base 2, because
- the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 12 870359 562756 762049 452459 127566 632277 259959 000326 130338 749506 > 2203 [i]